|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 70 post(s) |
Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core
Fatal Ascension
615
   |
Posted - 2012.03.28 10:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hakaru Ishiwara wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:...
Also, can you guys please stop +1ing - if you're under the impression that we're doing balance work based on how many posts there are in a thread you're barking up the wrong forest never mind the wrong tree. I'd hate to have to get someone to come in and clean the thread. If you do not respect that your subscribers believe a design idea has merit (hence their +1 support), then why even bother putting up a dev blog forum thread to which players can reply? If by "clean up" you mean remove subscriber input, then your lack of respect for your customer base is the same as it has been for the past several years. Your hubris is evidence that CCP's old guard is still set in its pre-2011 layoff ways and that does not bode well for EVE's or CCP's future. A good idea is a good idea and stands on its own. All +1ing - and particularly the kind of high-volume +1ing that we were seeing earlier in this thread, and I'm sure it was entirely a coincidence that a whole bunch of Goon/Test pilots dived into the thread within minutes to +1 it - does is make the thread harder to read, and more likely that a good idea gets lost in the deluge of posts.
Use space likes instead, guys.
Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |
Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core
Fatal Ascension
615
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 12:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Acwron wrote:Hey, I just got a brilliant idea !
Introduce fleet penalties ! More people in fleet, bigger penalty ! Goons dead. End of story.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Uja1atEteE
Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |
Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core
Fatal Ascension
622
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 19:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vheroki wrote:Most of you have no idea what you are talking about and keep posting in this thread only crap. The current need of usage of titans is a flaw due to a more flawed sov. system. Greyscale is running around for his own tail for weeks. I am down to what ever changes you want but make is so that sbu's, tcu's, ihubs can be killed only by capitals so this way a titan will be a decisive ship to use in sov warfare. Now you are crying that titans blap sub then you will cry that titans blap capitals. You just want them nerfed so you can safely kill everything with Maelstroms and drakes. This game needs to put people to work, think , improvise and not being in the same doctrine and win eve just because shear numbers. CCP is babling all the time that they encourage people to think out of the box and have alot of options available, those options are for people that use their brains
My sugestion: TCU , SBU , IHUB can be killed only by capitals - define a good role for titans ( CCP you started with the obvious role of being anti support ship and since then you change like the wind and you prefer to nerf to oblivion everything
POS: can be reinforced only by capitals )
And here you have the place of titans as being a anti-capital platform.
You presented at fan fest a nice presentation of all the ships from frigs to titans. In that presentation was like this Titan - Slow , Imposing - you can't be imposing when you can't kill ****. It is a pain for me to see this game being developed by Greyscale that has no idea how this game actually works, well maybe he does on PAPER.
Good luck Cryswarm
Here is to hoping that Shadoo's wonderful proposal of removing every combat capability from titans becomes truth!
Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |
Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core
Fatal Ascension
667
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 09:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Haven't visited this thread in a while.
Glad to see great big giant e-peen tears are still flowing like wine 
Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |
|
|
| |
|